Research record

Contribution of common and rare variants to Asian neovascular age-related macular degeneration subtypes.

Research record published by Nature communications, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
research-record record from Nature communications.
Why it may matter
It matched a longevity topic and may show how that evidence area is developing.
Evidence
Automated topic match 75%; this is not a medical rating.
Main limitation
One research record does not prove safety, effectiveness, or usefulness for an individual.
What changed
Source metadata was published or refreshed September 11, 2023.
Where to verify
Open the primary source below for methods, population, results, and limitations.
Published
September 11, 2023
Journal
Nature communications
Authors
Qiao Fan, Hengtong Li, Xiaomeng Wang, Yih-Chung Tham, Kelvin Yi Chong Teo, Masayuki Yasuda, Weng Khong Lim, Yuet Ping Kwan, Jing Xian Teo, Ching-Jou Chen, Li Jia Chen, Jeeyun Ahn, Sonia Davila, Masahiro Miyake, Patrick Tan, Kyu Hyung Park, Chi Pui Pang, Chiea Chuan Khor, Tien Yin Wong, Yasuo Yanagi, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Ching-Yu Cheng
DOI
10.1038/s41467-023-41256-z
Evidence class
research-record
Record status
published
Match confidence
75%
Source feed
PubMed
Automated source synopsis

Research record published by Nature communications, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Research record
Study design
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Evidence population
Not reported in reusable metadata
Participants
Not reported
Population
Not reported
Duration
Not reported
Intervention
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationBibliographic metadata identifies the record but does not provide enough reusable detail to summarize its population, comparison, findings, or effect size.

Safety and approvalThis index record does not establish safety, effectiveness, dose, or suitability for any person. A publication record is not a regulatory approval or treatment recommendation.

Source supportBibliographic citation metadata and controlled indexing terms only. Read the linked source for methods and results.

Evidence stage · research-recordThis describes the study type, not whether an intervention is safe or effective.
Lab or animalHuman studyRandomized trialEvidence synthesis
Why this record appears here · 75% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 75%Title contains controlled topic terminology. Title supplies ageing or longevity context.

Automated source check 95% · update recency 50%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.

BibTeX · RIS

vision aging
Read the original source →Export JSON