Research record

Optimizing future Telehealth mental health programs: a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study to identify key predictors of intervention response in the Telehealth intervention program for older adults (TIP-OA)

Human study published by BMC Psychiatry, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
human-study record from BMC Psychiatry.
Why it may matter
It matched a longevity topic and may show how that evidence area is developing.
Evidence
Automated topic match 100%; this is not a medical rating.
Main limitation
One research record does not prove safety, effectiveness, or usefulness for an individual.
What changed
Source metadata was published or refreshed March 1, 2026.
Where to verify
Open the primary source below for methods, population, results, and limitations.
Published
March 1, 2026
Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Authors
Christina Rigas, Paola Lavin, Chien-Lin Su, Mahdi Hassan, Karin Cinalioglu, Blanca Vacaflor, Elena Dikaios, Allana Goodman, Marim Ibrahim, Johanna Gruber, Jade Se, Neeti Sasi, Rim Nazar, Katie Bodenstein, Sasha Elbaz, Hannah Fajzel, Sonia Berkani, Cezara Hanganu, Helen Noble, Karl Looper, Stephane Bouchard, Dallas Seitz, Sanjeev Kumar, Olivier Beauchet, Cyrille Launay, Emily McDonald, Bassam Khoury, Andrew Ryder, Bruno Battistini, Pascal Fallavollita, Ipsit Vahia, Harmehr Sekhon, Syeda Bukhari, Soham Rej
DOI
10.1186/s12888-025-07688-1
Evidence class
human-study
Record status
published
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
Directory of Open Access Journals
Automated source synopsis

Human study published by BMC Psychiatry, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Human study
Study design
Open-access journal article
Evidence population
Human evidence
Participants
Not reported
Population
Not reported
Duration
Not reported
Intervention
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationBibliographic metadata identifies the record but does not provide enough reusable detail to summarize its population, comparison, findings, or effect size.

Safety and approvalThis index record does not establish safety, effectiveness, dose, or suitability for any person. A publication record is not a regulatory approval or treatment recommendation.

Source supportBibliographic citation metadata and controlled indexing terms only. Read the linked source for methods and results.

Evidence stage · human-studyThis describes the study type, not whether an intervention is safe or effective.
Lab or animalHuman studyRandomized trialEvidence synthesis
Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Mental health and ageing · 100%Title contains controlled term: mental health. Source terminology contains: mental health. Title supplies longevity context: older adult.

Automated source check 90% · update recency 85%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.

BibTeX · RIS

mental health aging
Read the original source →Export JSON