Research record

Primary endpoints in randomized controlled trials for older adults with cancer: A scoping review.

Randomized human study published by Journal of geriatric oncology, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
randomized-human record from Journal of geriatric oncology.
Why it may matter
It matched a longevity topic and may show how that evidence area is developing.
Evidence
Automated topic match 100%; this is not a medical rating.
Main limitation
One research record does not prove safety, effectiveness, or usefulness for an individual.
What changed
Source metadata was published or refreshed January 29, 2026.
Where to verify
Open the primary source below for methods, population, results, and limitations.
Published
January 29, 2026
Journal
Journal of geriatric oncology
Authors
Tomonori Mizutani, Funato Sato, Kohei Uemura, Yukari Shimizu, Tsuguo Iwatani, Satoshi Kobayashi, Masataka Sawaki, Shimon Tashiro, Tetsuya Tsuji, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Asao Ogawa, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Geriatric Study Committee of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, Japan
DOI
10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102895
Evidence class
randomized-human
Record status
published
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
PubMed
Automated source synopsis

Randomized human study published by Journal of geriatric oncology, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Randomized human study
Study design
Journal Article; Scoping Review
Evidence population
Human evidence
Participants
Not reported
Population
Not reported
Duration
Not reported
Intervention
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationBibliographic metadata identifies the record but does not provide enough reusable detail to summarize its population, comparison, findings, or effect size.

Safety and approvalThis index record does not establish safety, effectiveness, dose, or suitability for any person. A publication record is not a regulatory approval or treatment recommendation.

Source supportBibliographic citation metadata and controlled indexing terms only. Read the linked source for methods and results.

Evidence stage · randomized-humanThis describes the study type, not whether an intervention is safe or effective.
Lab or animalHuman studyRandomized trialEvidence synthesis
Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Cancer and ageing · 100%Title contains controlled topic terminology. Source terminology contains a controlled topic term. Title supplies ageing or longevity context.
  • Disability-free survival · 65%Source terminology contains a controlled topic term. Title supplies ageing or longevity context.

Automated source check 95% · update recency 85%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.

BibTeX · RIS