Research record

Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people.

Research record published by Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
research-record record from Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses.
Why it may matter
It matched a longevity topic and may show how that evidence area is developing.
Evidence
Automated topic match 100%; this is not a medical rating.
Main limitation
One research record does not prove safety, effectiveness, or usefulness for an individual.
What changed
Source metadata was published or refreshed February 8, 2025.
Where to verify
Open the primary source below for methods, population, results, and limitations.
Published
February 8, 2025
Journal
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses
Authors
Gustavo Martins Ferreira, João Carlos Clarck Barros, Nayane Maria Vieira, Isabelle de Almeida Souza, Asiya Shalova, Bertha Furlan Polegato, Leonardo Antônio Mamede Zornoff, Sergio Alberto Rupp de Paiva, Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas, Danilo Martins, Edson Luiz Favero Junior, Taline Lazzarin, Jemima Collins, Paula Schmidt Azevedo, Marcos Ferreira Minicucci
DOI
10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101201
Evidence class
research-record
Record status
published
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
PubMed
Automated source synopsis

Research record published by Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses, indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Inclusion in this index does not establish that an intervention is effective or safe.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Research record
Study design
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Evidence population
Not reported in reusable metadata
Participants
Not reported
Population
Not reported
Duration
Not reported
Intervention
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationBibliographic metadata identifies the record but does not provide enough reusable detail to summarize its population, comparison, findings, or effect size.

Safety and approvalThis index record does not establish safety, effectiveness, dose, or suitability for any person. A publication record is not a regulatory approval or treatment recommendation.

Source supportBibliographic citation metadata and controlled indexing terms only. Read the linked source for methods and results.

Evidence stage · research-recordThis describes the study type, not whether an intervention is safe or effective.
Lab or animalHuman studyRandomized trialEvidence synthesis
Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Polypharmacy · 100%Title contains controlled topic terminology. Source terminology contains a controlled topic term. Title supplies ageing or longevity context.

Automated source check 95% · update recency 65%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.

BibTeX · RIS

polypharmacy
Read the original source →Export JSON