A registered PHASE4 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Completed. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.
What the source actually supports
- Evidence stage
- Phase 4
- Study design
- NA · SINGLE GROUP · TREATMENT · NONE
- Evidence population
- Human clinical study registration
- Participants
- 154
- Population
- ALL · 50 Years
- Duration
- 2012-11-01 to 2015-09-01
- Intervention
- Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)
- Comparator
- Not reported
- Outcomes measured
- Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score From Baseline to Week 100 - Last Observation…; Percentage of Participants Whose Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Status Was "Dry" at Week 52 and at Week 100 (LOCF)…; Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥15 ETDRS Letters Compared With Baseline at Week 52 and Week 100 (LOCF) — At week…; Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Score Through Week 52 (LOCF) — Baseline to Week 52; Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥0, ≥5, ≥10, or ≥30 Letters From Baseline in BCVA Through Week 100 (LOCF) — Basel…; Percentage of Patients Who Lost >0, ≥5, ≥10, or ≥15 Letters From Baseline in BCVA Through Week 100 (LOCF) — Baseline to…
- Reported result
- No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.
Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.
Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.
Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.
Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.
Why this record appears here · 80% topic match
The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.
- Vision ageing · 80%Title contains controlled topic terminology. Title supplies ageing or longevity context.
Automated source check 100% · update recency 50%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.
