Clinical trial registry record

A Safety and Efficacy Study of a One-time Intravitreal Injection of SAR446597 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

A registered PHASE1, PHASE2 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Recruiting. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Recruiting.
Evidence
Registered phase 1, phase 2 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated September 22, 2026.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT07215234
Last registry update
September 22, 2026
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Sponsor
Sanofi
Enrollment
104
Countries
United States, Australia, United Kingdom
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered PHASE1, PHASE2 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Recruiting. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Phase 1, Phase 2
Study design
RANDOMIZED · SEQUENTIAL · TREATMENT · DOUBLE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
104
Population
ALL · 60 Years
Duration
2025-10-09 to 2032-07-22
Intervention
SAR446597; Sham Comparator
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Incidence and severity of ocular and non-ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) — Day 1 to Week 104; Incidence and severity of ocular and non-ocular treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) — Day 1 to Week 104; Change in square root-transformed (mm) and untransformed area (mm2) of GA — Baseline, Week 52, Week 104; Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to Week 52 and Week 104 following SAR446597 administration…; Percentage of participants without loss of BCVA of ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline in the study eye — Baseline, Week 52…; Incidence and severity of ocular and non-ocular TEAEs and TESAEs including clinically significant changes in safety par…
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · Phase 1, Phase 2A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 100%Title contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Abstract contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Title supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 100%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.

vision aging
Open primary sourceExport JSON