Clinical trial registry record

A Clinical Trial of EYE201/MK-8748 in People With Macular Degeneration (MK-8748-002)

A registered PHASE2, PHASE3 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Recruiting. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Recruiting.
Evidence
Registered phase 2, phase 3 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated September 18, 2026.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT07440225
Last registry update
September 18, 2026
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Sponsor
EyeBiotech Ltd.
Enrollment
960
Countries
United States, Argentina, Australia, Estonia, Germany, Israel, Latvia, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered PHASE2, PHASE3 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Recruiting. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Phase 2, Phase 3
Study design
RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · TREATMENT · TRIPLE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
960
Population
ALL · 50 Years
Duration
2026-03-27 to 2028-06-30
Intervention
Tiespectus; Aflibercept
Comparator
Aflibercept 2 mg
Outcomes measured
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) [Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS Letters)] From…; Mean Change in BCVA (ETDRS Letters) From Baseline (Day 1) Over Time to Year 1 — Up to Year 1; Proportion of Participants Who Gain ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Year 1 — Year 1; Proportion of Participants Who Gain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Year 1 — Year 1; Proportion of Participants Who Gain ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Year 1 — Year 1; Proportion of Participants Who Lose ≥5 ETDRS Letters at Year 1 — Year 1; Proportion of Participants Who Lose ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Year 1 — Year 1; Proportion of Participants Who Lose ≥15 ETDRS Letters at Year 1 — Year 1; Mean Change in Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Central Subfield Thickness (CST) From Baseline (Da…; Number of Participants who Experience One or More Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) — Up to approximately 96 weeks; Number of Participants who Experience One or More Ocular AEs — Up to approximately 96 weeks
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · Phase 2, Phase 3A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 100%Abstract contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Source terminology contains: age-related macular degeneration. Abstract supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 100%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.