Clinical trial registry record

Vitamin A Palmitate Supplementation in Patients With Reticular Pseudodrusen (RPD) and Delayed Dark Adaptation

A registered EARLY_PHASE1 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Completed. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Completed.
Evidence
Registered early phase 1 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated April 16, 2025.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT03478878
Last registry update
April 16, 2025
Status
Completed
Phase
EARLY Phase 1
Sponsor
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Enrollment
9
Countries
United States
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered EARLY_PHASE1 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Completed. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
EARLY Phase 1
Study design
NA · SINGLE GROUP · TREATMENT · NONE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
9
Population
ALL · 50 Years
Duration
2018-05-14 to 2022-06-17
Intervention
Vitamin A Palmitate
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Change in Dark Adaptation Rod Intercept Time (RIT) From Baseline in the Study Eye at the Treatment Completion Visit (Mo…; Change in Dark Adaptation Rod Intercept Time (RIT) From Baseline in the Study Eye at the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Visit…; Change in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) From Baseline in the Study Eye at the Treatment Completion and Post-Treatm…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Composite Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completion and Post-Treatmen…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Driving Subscale Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completion and Post-T…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Extreme Lighting Subscale Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completion a…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Mobility Subscale Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completion and Post-…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Emotional Distress Subscale Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completion…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) General Dim Lighting Subscale Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completi…; Change in Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) Peripheral Vision Subscale Score From Baseline at the Treatment Completion…
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · EARLY Phase 1A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 100%Abstract contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Source terminology contains: age-related macular degeneration. Abstract supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 65%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.