Clinical trial registry record

A Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

A registered PHASE4 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Active Not Recruiting. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Active Not Recruiting.
Evidence
Registered phase 4 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated July 31, 2026.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT06795048
Last registry update
July 31, 2026
Status
Active Not Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Enrollment
274
Countries
United States, Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered PHASE4 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Active Not Recruiting. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Phase 4
Study design
RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · TREATMENT · NONE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
274
Population
ALL · 50 Years
Duration
2025-03-14 to 2027-09-20
Intervention
Faricimab
Comparator
Not reported
Outcomes measured
Change from Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Averaged Over Weeks 44, 48, and 52 — Baseline and ave…; Change from Baseline in BCVA Score Averaged Over Weeks 92, 96, and 100 — Baseline and average of Weeks 92, 96, and 100; Change from Baseline in BCVA Score Over Time — From Baseline to Week 100; Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA from Baseline Over Time — From Baseline to Week 100; Percentage of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time — From Baseline to Week 100; Percentage of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse Over Time — From Baseline to Week 100; Change from Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Averaged Over Weeks 44, 48, and 52 — Baseline and average of W…; Change from Baseline in CST Averaged Over Weeks 92, 96, and 100 — Baseline and average of Weeks 92, 96, and 100; Change from Baseline in CST Over Time — From Baseline to Week 100; Percentage of Participants on Different Treatment Intervals at Weeks 52 and 100 — Weeks 52 and 100; Incidence and Severity of Ocular Adverse Events — From first study treatment to Week 100; Incidence and Severity of Non-Ocular Adverse Events — From first study treatment to Week 100
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · Phase 4A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 100%Title contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Abstract contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Source terminology contains: age-related macular degeneration. Title supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 100%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.