Clinical trial registry record

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KSI-301, an Anti-VEGF Antibody Biopolymer Conjugate, Versus Aflibercept in Patients With Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

A registered PHASE2, PHASE3 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Terminated. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Terminated.
Evidence
Registered phase 2, phase 3 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated July 18, 2024.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT04049266
Last registry update
July 18, 2024
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Sponsor
Kodiak Sciences Inc
Enrollment
559
Countries
United States, Czechia, Germany, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Spain
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered PHASE2, PHASE3 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Terminated. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Phase 2, Phase 3
Study design
RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · TREATMENT · TRIPLE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
559
Population
ALL · 50 Years
Duration
2019-10-08 to 2022-04-26
Intervention
KSI-301; Aflibercept; Sham Procedure
Comparator
Aflibercept 2 mg
Outcomes measured
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48 and 52, Full Analysis Set Year 1 — Year 1; Percentage of Subjects on KSI-301 Arm With a Once Every 12-Weeks, 16-Weeks or 20-Weeks Treatment Interval — Year 1; Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye, Full Analysis Set Year…; Percentage of Subjects Who Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better in the Study Eye at Year 1 — Year 1; Percentage of Subjects With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse in the Study Eye at Year 1 — Year 1; Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Day 1 — Year 1
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · Phase 2, Phase 3A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 100%Title contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Abstract contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Title supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 65%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.