Clinical trial registry record

The Avastin vs Visudyne for Neovascular AMD Study

A registered PHASE3 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Withdrawn. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Withdrawn.
Evidence
Registered phase 3 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated January 31, 2024.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT00390026
Last registry update
January 31, 2024
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
St. Erik Eye Hospital
Enrollment
0
Countries
Sweden
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered PHASE3 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Withdrawn. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Phase 3
Study design
RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · TREATMENT · DOUBLE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
0
Population
ALL · 50 Years
Duration
2006-11-01 to 2008-11-01
Intervention
Bevacizumab (Avastin); Verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT)
Comparator
Visudyne
Outcomes measured
Proportion of patients losing less than 15 letters on the ETDRS visual acuity chart. — 1 year; Proportion of patients gaining more than 15 letters on the ETDRS visual acuity chart. — 1 year; Proportion of patients losing more than 30 letters on the ETDRS visual acuity chart. — 1 year
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · Phase 3A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Vision ageing · 100%Abstract contains controlled term: age-related macular degeneration. Source terminology contains: age-related macular degeneration. Abstract supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 65%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.

vision aging
Open primary sourceExport JSON