A registered PHASE2 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Completed. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.
What the source actually supports
- Evidence stage
- Phase 2
- Study design
- RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · TREATMENT · SINGLE
- Evidence population
- Human clinical study registration
- Participants
- 56
- Population
- ALL · 50 Years
- Duration
- 2019-09-26 to 2021-06-03
- Intervention
- Drug: GB-102; Aflibercept
- Comparator
- Aflibercept 2 mg
- Outcomes measured
- Time to First Rescue Treatment — Baseline through 12 months; Time to Fulfillment of at Least One Rescue Criterion — 6 months through 12 months; Number of Times That at Least One Rescue Criterion is Met — Baseline through 12 months; Number of Treatments, Including Both Rescue and Scheduled Study Treatments, During the Study — Baseline through 12 mont…; Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (ETDRS Letter Score) at All Visits — Baseline through 12 mo…; Categorical Change From Baseline in BCVA (ETDRS Letter Score) at All Visits — Baseline through 12 months; Frequency of Subjects With BCVA Worse Than 20/200 (Snellen Equivalent) at All Visits — Baseline through 12 months; Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) (μm) at All Visits — Baseline through 12 months; Frequency of Subjects With Absence of Exudation (Intra-/Sub-retinal Fluid/Cystoid Edema) at at All Visits — Baseline th…
- Reported result
- No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.
Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.
Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.
Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.
Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.
Why this record appears here · 60% topic match
The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.
- Vision ageing · 60%Source terminology contains: age-related macular degeneration. Source terminology supplies longevity context: age-related. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.
Automated source check 100% · update recency 50%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.
