Clinical trial registry record

Study of the Safety and Efficacy of LCZ696 on Arterial Stiffness in Elderly Patients With Hypertension

A registered PHASE2 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Completed. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Plain-language guide

Five questions to ask about this record

What this is
A clinical study registration, not a result or recommendation.
Why it may matter
The registry currently reports Completed.
Evidence
Registered phase 2 study.
Main limitation
Registration does not prove that the intervention works, is safe, or is available to you.
What changed
Registry metadata was last updated May 4, 2016.
Where to verify
Open the primary registry below for eligibility, locations, contacts, and current status.
Registry ID
NCT01692301
Last registry update
May 4, 2016
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Enrollment
454
Countries
United States, Argentina, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan
Match confidence
100%
Source feed
ClinicalTrials.gov
Automated source synopsis

A registered PHASE2 study indexed because it matched monitored longevity research terms. Registry status: Completed. Registration does not establish safety or effectiveness.

Evidence snapshot

What the source actually supports

Evidence stage
Phase 2
Study design
RANDOMIZED · PARALLEL · TREATMENT · DOUBLE
Evidence population
Human clinical study registration
Participants
454
Population
ALL · 60 Years
Duration
2012-12-01 to 2015-04-01
Intervention
LCZ696; Olmesartan; LCZ696 matching placebo; Olmesartan matching placebo; amlodipine; hydrochlorothiazide
Comparator
Olmesartan
Outcomes measured
Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 12 Weeks — baseline, 12 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Central Pulse (CPP) Pressure — Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) — baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 52 Weeks — baseline, 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) — baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) — baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Pulse Pressure (msPP) — baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) — baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP) — Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP) — Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks; Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Pulse Pressure (maPP) — Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks
Reported result
No reusable finding-level result is available in this record.

Main limitationThis is a study registration. No reusable structured result is available here, so it cannot show whether the intervention worked or was safe.

Safety and approvalEligibility, adverse-event details, and clinical decisions must be checked in the official registry and with qualified clinicians. Trial registration is not regulatory approval and does not establish that an intervention is available.

Source supportStructured registry protocol metadata; no finding-level conclusion is generated.

Trial stage · Phase 2A trial phase describes development stage; it does not establish a positive result.
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

Registration and recruitment status do not establish safety, efficacy, or regulatory approval.

Why this record appears here · 100% topic match

The title, summary, or source keywords matched one or more topics followed by immortal.life. A higher percentage means a stronger topic match; it does not rate safety, effectiveness, or study quality.

  • Cardiovascular ageing · 100%Title contains controlled term: arterial stiffness. Abstract contains controlled term: arterial stiffness. Title supplies longevity context: elderly. Study type is explicitly identified as INTERVENTIONAL.

Automated source check 100% · update recency 35%. These figures help sort records; they are not medical ratings.