Where can you learn from university research?
Explore which universities appear most often in source-matched longevity research, with filters by topic, country, and region.
Tracked topics
Put two evidence landscapes side by side.
Compare what the index currently contains—not which intervention is “best.” Counts describe source-linked coverage and study maturity; they do not establish benefit, safety, or suitability for any person.
Choose two different topics. You can share the resulting comparison URL.
Evidence comparison
Choose a topic. See how far the evidence goes.
Explore published research, studies involving people, and clinical trials. An empty layer means we have no matching record in this snapshot—not that no evidence exists anywhere.
The most useful gaps are relationships between evidence layers.
These are discovery cohorts, not scientific verdicts. Select one to inspect the exact topics and records behind it.
Evidence timeline
A source-linked history of new records, trial changes, official notices, corrections, and retractions. This shows movement in the evidence—not whether a treatment works.
New research records
Follow grants and disclosed funding behind longevity research.
Browse all funder profiles →Direct grant records from official funder databases are shown separately from award acknowledgements found on publications. This makes the provenance—and the meaning—of every record clear.
Award-linked research over time
Grants reported by official funder databases
Awards connected to indexed longevity publications
These records indicate that a publication named a funder or award. They do not establish the full grant value, duration, or scope.
Trial Radar
Follow the distance between trial completion and visible results.
This monitor checks completed longevity trial registrations. A possible gap means the indexed registry record shows no posted results more than 12 months after its listed completion date. It is a discovery signal—not proof that results are legally overdue, unpublished everywhere, or withheld.
How visible results vary across completed trial cohorts
Latest regulatory updates
Live notices appear here only after they pass the automated relevance checks. The official-source library below remains available at all times, so you can verify approvals, safety alerts, recalls, shortages, and product information directly with authorities worldwide.
Regulatory guides by country and region
Each guide explains where to look, what the authority covers, and what its decisions do—and do not—mean. Every card links to the authority itself.
Research integrity
Evidence by topic
Each row is one tracked longevity topic. Counts show indexed source relationships—not proof that an intervention works—and a record may belong to more than one topic.
People, organisations, and topics
Universities active in longevity research.
Select a region to filter the complete ranking. Activity counts source-matched work and topic breadth; it does not rank research quality.
Download the indexCompare selected universities
- 013,003five-year work links
- 02Baltimore, United States
Johns Hopkins University
72 longevity topics represented in the current index.
1,358five-year work links - 031,217five-year work links
- 04San Francisco, United States
University of California, San Francisco
72 longevity topics represented in the current index.
1,054five-year work links - 05Los Angeles, United States
University of California, Los Angeles
72 longevity topics represented in the current index.
1,038five-year work links - 06944five-year work links
- 07963five-year work links
- 08Philadelphia, United States
University of Pennsylvania
69 longevity topics represented in the current index.
898five-year work links - 09San Diego, United States
University of California San Diego
70 longevity topics represented in the current index.
849five-year work links - 10Pittsburgh, United States
University of Pittsburgh
69 longevity topics represented in the current index.
896five-year work links - 11Chapel Hill, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
66 longevity topics represented in the current index.
800five-year work links - 12St Louis, United States
Washington University in St. Louis
67 longevity topics represented in the current index.
766five-year work links - 13Los Angeles, United States
University of Southern California
69 longevity topics represented in the current index.
750five-year work links - 14827five-year work links
- 15809five-year work links
- 16Minneapolis, United States
University of Minnesota
70 longevity topics represented in the current index.
708five-year work links - 17753five-year work links
- 18Houston, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
68 longevity topics represented in the current index.
608five-year work links - 19573five-year work links
- 20551five-year work links
- 21New York, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
69 longevity topics represented in the current index.
594five-year work links - 22614five-year work links
- 23630five-year work links
- 24Birmingham, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
66 longevity topics represented in the current index.
580five-year work links - 25Aurora, United States
University of Colorado Anschutz
64 longevity topics represented in the current index.
596five-year work links - 26521five-year work links
- 27Madison, United States
University of Wisconsin–Madison
68 longevity topics represented in the current index.
526five-year work links - 28Davis, United States
University of California, Davis
69 longevity topics represented in the current index.
487five-year work links - 29Gainesville, United States
University of Florida
67 longevity topics represented in the current index.
499five-year work links - 30Columbus, United States
The Ohio State University
67 longevity topics represented in the current index.
486five-year work links
Choose a region, then a country
Each card shows exactly how many official sources and countries are represented. Select one to filter the directory.
All checks run automatically. Match confidence estimates topic relevance; it does not rate safety or effectiveness. No scientist, clinician, editor, or human reviewer approves individual records before publication. See how records are checked.
Where this information comes from
The intelligence feed is temporarily unavailable.
No uncited fallback content has been substituted. Please try again shortly.